Showing posts with label anthropologists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anthropologists. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 4, 2015

Body Size Increase Not A Major Factor for Evolution in Homo Genus - http://clapway.com/2015/08/04/body-size-increase-not-a-major-factor-for-evolution-in-homo-genus-324/

According to a new analysis, body size may not have been the contributing factor that gave rise to the Homo genus, a theory that is quite contrary to many current evolutionary studies hypotheses that indicate a body size increase provided the boost that led to the origin of humans.


Body Size Does Not Matter In Evolutionary Sciences Suggests Study


Evolutionary studies may soon be rocked by a new study published by Mark Grabowski, assistant research professor at George Washington University’s Center for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology (CASHP).


Grabowski’s research in essence explains that early hominins of the Homo genus may not have been much larger than other early hominins from other species. His analysis is revolutionary in the field of evolution as almost all theories regarding the origins of Homo rely on the purported body size increase at specific times in the evolutionary chain.
Early Hominin Skull Comparisons


The Myth of Body Size and the Origin of the Homo Genus


The study analysis has used the latest methodologies and also the largest fossil samples of early hominins to create the most comprehensive data set on body mass estimations, focusing on species averages in general as well as by sex for each hominin.


The data revealed that the body size increase didn’t occur between Australopithecus and the earliest hominins of Homo, but rather showed up in the fossils much later in Homo erectus.


As a Fulbright scholar at the University of Oslo’s Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Grabowski believes the most important findings in the study are knowing that increase in body size was not the the factor that set us (modern humans and our Homo genus) apart from our earlier hominin ancestors.


Because body mass did not set us apart from them, many other assumptions about the jump from the past hominins to our genus will be seen as myths now,  too. These unconfirmed theories that might be included in the myth debunking is that earlier hominins were small in stature because of dietary restrictions.


The last major publication on hominin body mass was published in 1992 by Henry M. McHenry and in the two decades that have since passed, many fossils have been found that would add to the data set, presenting more conclusive details about early species of humans.


The study researchers drew on McHenry’s results, applying new methodologies of analyzing the fossil data set, and updating the fossil hominin body estimates. This recent study is the largest, most comprehensive fossil data set for early hominins and may be used as the new standard for anthropologists.


Body Size Increase Not A Major Factor for Evolution in Homo Genus


Body Size Sexual Dimorphism and The Evolutionary Link


Grabowski’s study didn’t end with updating the fossil collection data set, but instead also revealed that dimorphism decreased very slightly in comparing the early hominins to H. erectus. Only much, much later in our human evolution did the researchers see the modern levels of dimorphism that we currently have.


Though this may seem insignificant after such a major feat in compiling the comprehensive data, the findings could in fact challenge the monogamous social structure of relationships that evolutionary assumptions have attributed to earlier Homo members.


While body size may not have led to the origin of our species, it may lead to some interesting new research in the field of evolutionary studies thanks to Grabowski’s updated fossil data set.



 


Be human and record your journey with a Moleskine:




Body Size Increase Not A Major Factor for Evolution in Homo Genus

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Another reason to #reduce #fossilfuels -- particularly for the #anthroplogists and #archaeologists - http://clapway.com/2015/07/21/bad-news-for-science-fossil-fuels-may-impact-carbon-dating-by-2100/

As early as 2100, fossil fuel emissions may have a huge impact on the esteemed carbon dating technique, leaving archaeologists, paleontologists and researchers in many varied fields unable to tell the difference in age between a new plant and an old fossil from hundreds of years ago.


Burning Fossil Fuels Affects More Than Just Climate Change


Fossil fuels have been a notorious phrase when paired with climate change and ecological systems for quite some time. Now, they may be even more insidious than ever.


New research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences proves fossil fuels may will ultimately create devastating problems to radiocarbon dating, an important research technique used by a variety of scientists and industries.


Fossil Fuel Emissions May Make Carbon Dating Obsolete


From paleontologists dating dinosaur bones to archaeologists uncovering the ages of ancient humans to law enforcement agencies use of identifying human remains, carbon dating is used in many fields. According to the research author Heather Graven of Imperial College London, if fossil fuel emissions continue growing at the rate they have been, the carbon difference between old and new things will be insignificant as an accurate method of dating.


Why Fossil Fuels and Their Emission will Impact Carbon Dating


Graven, a climate physicist whose research focuses on human activities, climate change, and the global carbon cycle, argues that by the year 2100, researchers using the carbon dating technique will be unable to tell apart newly-dead foliage from 2,000-year-old papyrus, like the Dead Sea Scrolls.


Though it may seem inconsequential to those outside of the science fields of paleontology and archaeology, the loss of the carbon dating technique that reveals the age of a particular subject will affect law enforcement, crime labs, meteorologists, oceanographers, and so many more industries.


To fully understand the implications of Graven’s research, the science behind carbon dating must be explained.


The science behind carbon dating


Boiled down as simply as possible, radiocarbon dating in essence measures the ratio of carbon-14 in a sample to carbon-13, the more stable isotope that carbon-14 becomes over time. As the carbon-14 levels fall, so does the ratio, which means the sample being tested is older.


But how does the carbon get into us in the first place? Basically, every day atmospheric nitrogen is converted by cosmic rays into radiocarbon, which then combines with atmospheric oxygen to become carbon dioxide. Every day, carbon dioxide is absorbed by plants via photosynthesis. Animals and humans acquire carbon-14 through eating plants or eating animals that eat plants. When something dies, the carbon-14 within that sample starts to undergo radioactive decay. So the less carbon-14, the older the sample.


How reduced fossil fuel emissions can help save carbon dating


Though the research has shown that carbon dating may be at risk, Dr. Graven has also suggested that reducing fossil fuel emissions is still an option.


Depending on whether we increase or decrease our reliance and use of fossil fuels, we may be able to save one of the most widely-used research techniques in science and keep utilizing radiocarbon dating for much longer.



 


We might still be able to save radiocarbon dating in taking care of the planet. Atmoph celebrates nature in our planet:




Bad News for Science: Fossil Fuels May Impact Carbon Dating by 2100